On September 25, 2008, the President signed the Americans with
Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 ("ADA Amendments Act" or "Act"). The Act
makes important changes to the definition of the term "disability" by rejecting
the holdings in several Supreme Court decisions and portions of EEOC's ADA
regulations. The Act retains the ADA's basic definition of "disability" as an
impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a record
of such an impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. However,
it changes the way that these statutory terms should be interpreted in several
ways. The ADAAA is intended to redress the broad array of federal court cases
that, in the words of the act, have "created an inappropriately high level of
limitation necessary to obtain coverage under the ADA," resulting in decisions
holding that "people with a range of substantially limiting impairments are not
people with disabilities."
Thus, the ADAAA explicitly rejects the strict standard created by the Supreme
Court in Williams that to be substantially limited in a major life activity, an
"individual must have an impairment that prevents or severely restricts the
individual from doing activities that are of central importance to most people's
daily lives."
Most significantly, the Act:
directs EEOC to revise that portion of its regulations
defining the term "substantially limits";
expands the definition of "major life activities" by
including two non-exhaustive lists:
the first list includes many activities that the EEOC
has recognized (e.g., walking) as well as activities that EEOC has not
specifically recognized (e.g., reading, bending, and communicating);
the second list includes major bodily functions (e.g.,
"functions of the immune system, normal cell growth, digestive, bowel,
bladder, neurological, brain, respiratory, circulatory, endocrine, and
reproductive functions");
clarifies that an impairment that is episodic or in
remission is a disability if it would substantially limit a major life
activity when active; See below #2
provides that an individual subjected to an action
prohibited by the ADA (e.g., failure to hire) because of an actual or
perceived impairment will meet the "regarded as" definition of disability,
unless the impairment is transitory and minor; See below #3
provides that individuals covered only under the "regarded
as" prong are not entitled to reasonable accommodation; and
emphasizes that the definition of "disability" should be
interpreted broadly. states that mitigating measures other than "ordinary
eyeglasses or contact lenses" shall not be considered in assessing whether
an individual has a disability; See below #1
1. Mitigating measures: The ADAAA clearly states that a
determination of whether an individual is substantially limited in a major life
activity shall be made without regard to mitigating measures (e.g., medication,
medical supplies, equipment, and other auxiliary aids or services). Thus, the
new law rejects the Supreme Court's Sutton decision that allowed consideration
of mitigating measures in determining if someone was disabled. So, for example,
a diabetic who uses insulin may nevertheless be deemed disabled even if the
insulin controls the sugar imbalance. (Prescription eyeglasses and contact
lenses, however, may still be considered in assessing whether an individual is
"substantially limited."
2. Major life activities: The ADAAA now includes a nonexclusive list of
major life activities, including sleeping, learning, concentrating, thinking,
and communicating. A significant addition now lists the operation of "major
bodily functions," including functions of the "immune system, normal cell
growth, digestive, bowel, bladder, neurological, brain, respiratory,
circulatory, endocrine, and reproductive functions." These changes will help
eliminate the confusion about what conditions may fall under the ADA and direct
attention to the underlying medical condition.
3. "Regarded as" analysis: The ADAAA expands "regarded
as" protections by prohibiting discrimination based on the employer's perception
of a mental or physical impairment, whether or not the individual can establish
that the impairment actually limits, or is perceived to substantially limit, a
major life activity.
In one piece of good news for employers: employees cannot
establish that they have been regarded as disabled if their impairment is
transitory and minor, meaning its duration or expected duration is six months or
less. So an employee who breaks her wrist and wears a cast for six weeks cannot
claim she has been regarded as disabled.
Some employers may not see much change. In states such as
California, New Jersey and New York, state or local laws are even more expansive
than the amended ADA, and employers in these states may already be used to the
broader disability coverages under state and local laws. Nationwide, however,
the expanded definition of "disability" under the act will increase the number
of individuals protected by federal law.
For example, the ADAAA makes clear that impairments that are
episodic or in remission can still be considered a "disability" if they would
substantially limit a major life activity when active. Accordingly, in deciding
if a reasonable accommodation is owed to an employee, you will need to consider
not only the current effects of an impairment, but also what the effects would
be if the impairment were in an active state.
But the ADAAA removes the focus from a "disability" inquiry, and
places the focus squarely on the individualized interactive process. Thus,
employers must be prepared to engage applicants and employees in a reasonable
accommodations conversation and, as appropriate, provide qualified individuals
with accommodations to perform their essential job duties. One question may be”
Can you perform the essential duties and responsibilities of the job with or
without accommodation?” From the answer you can decide how to handle the
situation If employees or applicants claim a disability and you request
substantiation, some documentary evidence from a healthcare practitioner
supporting the disability claim and reflecting the limitation(s) will still be
needed to assess if a covered disability exists.
Remember that if the disability is obvious, a duty to
accommodate might exist even if the employee has not asked for an accommodation.
In one recent case, Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (2008), the 2nd U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals affirmed an award of $900,000 to a former pharmacy assistant
with cerebral palsy, but who never requested an accommodation.
Of course, identifying and offering reasonable accommodations
does not mean that any individual is entitled to a job. The ADAAA makes it clear
that the individual must be qualified. Reasonable accommodations are designed to
put the applicant or employee on an equal footing with other qualified
individuals.
What Should You Do As An Employer?
If you have 15 or more employees or your State has a more
stringent law:
1. Employers should review their policies and practices
governing the ADA's interactive process and revisit the essential functions of
the jobs to ascertain what functions are the core responsibilities that may
require accommodations.
2. In light of the new focus on reasonable accommodations,
employers should remember that the ADA itself provides a nonexhaustive list of
accommodations, including, for example, acquiring certain equipment; adjusting
exams, training materials, or policies; providing qualified interpreters;
reallocating nonessential job functions; permitting part-time or modified work
schedules; and reassigning employees to vacant, equivalent positions. In
addition, the EEOC and a host of court decisions make clear that unpaid leaves
must also be considered.
3. In the new world of the ADAAA, employers should keep records
of accommodations requests made and accommodations denied or provided, along
with some evidentiary back-up for the decisions made. Further, consider
refresher training of human resources professionals and line managers about the
ADA's requirements about the interactive process and reasonable accommodations.
4. Make sure that in the Interview Process that, proper
interviewing techniques are used. No questions about disability should be asked
you can be establishing a situation of “Regarded As”.
5. Employers should be extremely cautious about taking any
employment action based on an individual’s actual or perceived physical or
mental impairment. Employees will most likely have greater success establishing
that they have been discriminated against because of a perceived disability.
Effective Date:
The ADA Amendments Act is effective as of January 1, 2009.
This material is provided as general knowledge. It is not to
be construed as legal advice. Be sure to get expert assistance before
implementing any policy, procedure or taking any type of action that affects the
employment arrangement. There may be additional requirements that your company
must satisfy in relation to Federal, State, County or City laws and regulations.
Michael A. Holzschu is the managing principal in the firm of
Holzschu, Jordan Schiff & Associates specializing in Human Resource Systems,
with a special focus on employee handbooks, job descriptions, performance
appraisal systems, harassment training, safety and quality issues. He can be
contacted at (248) 476-6907 or by email at
mholzschu@hjsa.com or
mholzschu@businessknowhow.com. The company’s client base is primarily small
to medium employers from all types of industries located throughout the United
States. Company website:
www.hjsa.com.
State and
Federal Combined
Labor Law Posters
Labor law posters combine state, federal and OSHA required labor law notices on one
laminated poster. Order
Now.
Get
free marketing, sales, advertising
and management ideas
delivered to your inbox.
The information compiled on this site is
Copyright 1999-2009 by Attard Communications, Inc. and by the individual authors.
Business Know-How is a woman-owned business and a registered trademark of Attard Communications, Inc.
Phone: 631-467-8883.