What if we treated our children this way?
Imagine the consequences of a parent treating their six-year-old and
seventeen-year-old equally. That would mean telling the younger child,
"Make sure you are home from grade one by midnight!" Most people
appreciate that it makes sense to treat children fairly. It would,
however, be a mistake to treat them all equally, and apply the same
rules regardless of their ages. That's more than just a mistake; we
might even call it immoral.
We already discriminate in the workplace
There's a certain irony to taking this approach to the workplace. The
same individuals who assume that all customers should be treated
equally, often have no objection whatsoever to the organization offering
preferential parking and restroom facilities to customers with
disabilities. Yet, that's a blatant example of treating customers fairly
but not equally. I don't know of anyone who objects to organizations
giving better parking spots to the disabled. Yet, every day we hear
employees using inane statements like, "If I did that for you, I'd have
to do it for everyone."
The challenge for business owners and managers is providing the kind
of training and authority that front-line employees need, so that they
will make more appropriate on-the-spot decisions for customers.
The truth about word-of-mouth
"What happens when customers talk to each other?" That's one of the most
common concerns I hear from employees in my training sessions where we
address this subject. They are afraid that if they accommodate one
customer's special request, then that customer will talk to other
customers, and the employee will be pressured to do the same for
everyone, which, of course, they can't do. In other words, they're going
to have a lot of unhappy people out there if they accommodate special
requests. This is the kind of convoluted logic that stems from the
underlying belief in treating everyone equally (not necessarily fairly).
Another way of putting it is: I'm afraid that if I provide an extra
service for one customer (because we made an error or the customer does
a lot of business with us), then I'm going to disappoint other customers
whose circumstances don't warrant the extra service. So to avoid
disappointing some people, we'll just make a rule that no one gets
special treatment. That way, we'll just disappoint everyone, including
customers whose unique situation deserves extra service.
Customers understand the concept of fairness. If I've never been to a
particular convenience store and suddenly walk in just to change a
hundred-dollar bill, I'm not likely to get outraged when the employee
explains that they don't have enough change on hand so they can't help
me. If, on the other hand, I'm doing business there every day, I'm more
likely to be upset if my store won't make change for me when I know they
make that much change every fifteen minutes. If they do make an
exception for me because I'm a good customer, I'm not going to rush out,
phone all my friends, and tell them, "Hey, my convenience store made
change for me, and they don't usually accept hundreds!"
Customers rarely go out of their way to talk about good service. The
occasion when customers share information about a business is when the
service is bad. Bottom line: employees needn't worry about possible
negative ramifications of taking extra care of good customers. What they
should be far more concerned about is the negative impact of treating
all customers the same.
This article is based on the critically acclaimed
book, Becoming a Service Icon in 90 Minutes a Month by business
strategist and international speaker Jeff Mowatt. To obtain your own
copy of his book or to inquire about engaging Jeff for your team, visit
www.jeffmowatt.com
or call 1-800-JMowatt (566-9288)